Home > Academic Affairs > SOE > Catholic Education > Vol. 6 > Iss. 3 (2013)
Abstract
With a spirited criticism of Zelman v. Simmons-Harris (2002), this article summarizes many arguments against the voucher decision, including the dissenting opinions of U.S. Supreme Court justices, opponents of the decision, and amicus curiae briefs from the American Jewish Committee, the Anti-Defamation League, and the Ohio School Boards Association, all of whom argued against the Cleveland Plan. In the end, the decision may prove dangerous to Catholic schools that accept public voucher monies.
DOI
10.15365/joce.0603052013
First Page
328
Last Page
341
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Recommended Citation
McLeod, S. (2003). The Legal and Social Infirmities of Zelman v. Simmons-Harris. Journal of Catholic Education, 6 (3). http://dx.doi.org/10.15365/joce.0603052013