Document Type
Article - post-print
Publication Date
2006
Abstract
Electronic versions of questionnaires have the potential to improve research and interventions in the addictions. Administering questionnaires electronically to groups, however, has proven difficult without a multitude of computers, but gathering data electronically from a group could make for easy assessment and quick feedback. Using a sample of 107 college students, we examined the validity of wireless keypad survey responses by comparing them to traditional paper-and-pencil questionnaires. The two formats led to almost identical responses that did not differ significantly from each other (all effect sizes less than g =.15) and high correlations between formats. The wireless, handheld keypad procedure appears to generate data that are as valid as questionnaire responses and permit rapid feedback to groups, as well as easy, human error-free data entry for analysis.
Publisher Statement
This is an author-manuscript of an article accepted for publication in [insert journal title] following peer review. The version of record: LaBrie, J., Earleywine, M., Lamb, T., & Shelesky, K. (2006). Comparing electronic-keypad responses to paper-and-pencil questionnaires in group assessments of alcohol consumption and related attitudes. Addictive Behaviors, 31(12), 2334–2338. is available online at: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2006.03.004.
Recommended Citation
LaBrie, J., Earleywine, M., Lamb, T., & Shelesky, K. (2006). Comparing electronic-keypad responses to paper-and-pencil questionnaires in group assessments of alcohol consumption and related attitudes. Addictive Behaviors, 31(12), 2334–2338. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2006.03.004
