<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Philosophy Faculty Works</title>
<copyright>Copyright (c) 2013 Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School All rights reserved.</copyright>
<link>http://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/phil_fac</link>
<description>Recent documents in Philosophy Faculty Works</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2013 23:25:16 PST</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>3600</ttl>








<item>
<title>Evolution Is Opportunistic, Not Directional - Response</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/phil_fac/4</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/phil_fac/4</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 14:39:23 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>Argues against an article published in 'BioScience' magazine in which Timothy Shanahan says that evolution is progressive and directional and embodies improvement.Discussion of regressive and progressive evolution and the accompanying multiplication or loss of phenotypic characteristics; Illustrations related to the blindness and loss of pigmentation in troglobitic, or deep-sea cave organisms; Response from Shanahan.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Timothy Shanahan</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Evolutionary Progress?</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/phil_fac/3</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/phil_fac/3</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 14:39:22 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	
	]]>
</description>

<author>Timothy Shanahan</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>The Evolutionary Indeterminism Thesis</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/phil_fac/2</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/phil_fac/2</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 14:39:21 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>Evolutionary   indeterminists argue that, in addition to any indeterminism introduced by   quantum events, at least some evolutionary processes are themselves   fundamentally indeterministic. That is, they maintain that the chance element   in evolutionary processes results from indeterminism in the processes   themselves, rather than simply from our cognitive limitations. Not everyone   has been persuaded. A number of philosophers have argued that claims for   evolutionary indeterminism are premature at best and deeply confused at   worst. They maintain that evolutionary processes can and should be understood   as deterministic processes. According to them, "chance" is merely a   word denoting our ignorance of causes. This controversy is now one of the   liveliest topics in the philosophy of biology. This article reviews the main   arguments on each side, showing how the issues at stake in this debate raise   fundamental questions about the nature of science as an explanatory   enterprise and of the world it seeks to explain.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Timothy Shanahan</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Teleology and Moral Action in Kant&apos;s Philosophy of Culture.</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/phil_fac/1</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/phil_fac/1</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 14:54:11 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	
	]]>
</description>

<author>Jeffrey L. Wilson</author>


</item>





</channel>
</rss>
