Abstract
Celebrities are constantly registering for trademarks to protect and
monetize off their brand, but they take advantage of trademark laws. Although
certain trademark registrations are justified and necessary for brand
protection, others are not. Furthermore, allowing celebrities to have hundreds
of registered trademarks does nothing to achieve the purpose of trademark
law.
This Note is about how celebrities excessively register trademarks for
their names and catchphrases. First, this Note discusses the background of
trademark law, including the difference between ® and TM. In addition, this
Note explains the ways in which celebrities can sue under the Lanham Act –
Federal Trademark Infringement, Federal Unfair Competition, and/or Federal
Trademark Dilution. The criteria that must be met in order to register a
trademark is also discussed. Next, this Note examines how some trademarks
are allowed to be registered while others are not. Lastly, this Note contends
that there is over-protection of celebrities and trademark law can be too generous
at times, which disadvantages non-celebrities and small businesses.
This note suggests that celebrities should not be allowed to have trademark
protection for a name or phrase if they are not already producing, selling, or
distributing products with the mark. In addition, celebrities should not be
allowed to register just their first name and should not be allowed to register
catchphrases that are common strings of words. With these proposed solutions,
the current law would have to change in order for the U.S. Patent and
Trademark Office to be stricter when deciding which marks should be registered.
Recommended Citation
Rebecca Zilberman,
"That's Hot!" Celebrities Use Trademarks to Add to Their Wealth, But Is It Excessive?,
42 Loy. L.A. Ent. L. Rev. 273
(2022).
Available at: https://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/elr/vol42/iss3/3