•  
  •  
 

Abstract

This article practices Participatory Law Scholarship and Movement Law to engage Marginalized and Mobilized Youth in legal scholarship and to elevate their resistance against book bans and trans bans. Together, we—a legal scholar-practitioner, frontline movement lawyer, Youth community legal worker, and law student-activist—make the positive claim that book bans and trans bans constitute a dignity taking—a state action that takes property from a marginalized group and dehumanizes and infantilizes that group in the process. Further, we make the normative claim that legal advocates committed to repairing the deprivations of these bans and bills must attend to both the material loss and the immaterial loss of Youth dignity. The article concludes with movement lawyering and prefigurative strategies that legal scholars and practitioners can use to win material change, redistribute power and property, and reimagine law in solidarity with targeted Youth. As the first piece of legal scholarship to join frontline practitioners and Youth legal workers as co-authors, this article provides new insights on the material failure of constitutional law to protect Mobilized and Marginalized Youth from the legislative and administrative violence of book bans and trans bans.

Volume Number

1

Issue Number

1

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.