Disciplinary Identities: On the Rhetorical Paths between English and Communication Studies
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
Spring 2000
Abstract
This essay explores some rhetorical paths of thought connecting the discipline of English Studies and Speech Communication. I focus on the rhetoric of science during two periods of disciplinary development: the use of scientific rhetoric to articulate new disciplinary identities in the 1910s and the debates over the rhetorical study of science in the 1990s. The transition from the former to the latter period was significantly affected by what might be called a rhetorical hermeneutics developed around 1960 by Chaim Perelman, Hans-Georg Gadamer, and Thomas Kuhn. The establishment of Composition Studies provides an example of the changed rhetorical context for disciplinary legitimation in the late twentieth century. The main purpose of this rhetorical history is to encourage renewed dialogue among rhetoricians studying Literature, Composition, and Communication.
Original Publication Citation
Mailloux, Steven. “Disciplinary Identities: On the Rhetorical Paths between English and Communication Studies.” Rhetoric Society Quarterly, vol. 30, no. 2, 2000, pp. 5–29. DOI: 10.1080/02773940009391173.
Digital Commons @ LMU & LLS Citation
Mailloux, Steven J., "Disciplinary Identities: On the Rhetorical Paths between English and Communication Studies" (2000). English Faculty Works. 22.
https://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/engl_fac/22
Comments
LMU users: use the following link to login and access the article via LMU databases.