Can it be Morally Permissible to Assert a Falsehood for a Good Cause?
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
2012
Abstract
This paper examines three arguments that are meant to show that all intentional false assertions are intrinsically evil. The first argument holds that lying is intrinsically evil, all false assertions are lies. The second argument is that all intentional deception is intrinsically evil, and all false assertions are attempted deceptions. Finally, I explore the argument that false assertions are intrinsically evil because they are a violation of self-unity and unity with the community. Each of these arguments, I hold, fails to demonstrate the conclusion which, nevertheless, may be true for other reasons not examined in this paper.
Original Publication Citation
Kaczor, Christopher. “Can It Be Morally Permissible to Assert a Falsehood in Service of a Good Cause?:” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 86, no. 1 (2012): 97–109. https://doi.org/10.5840/acpq_2012_5.
Digital Commons @ LMU & LLS Citation
Kaczor, Christopher, "Can it be Morally Permissible to Assert a Falsehood for a Good Cause?" (2012). Philosophy Faculty Works. 206.
https://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/phil_fac/206
Comments
LMU users: use the following link to login and access the article via LMU databases.