Document Type
Book Chapter
Publication Date
2022
Abstract
In philosophy, an argument consists of a set of statements called premises that serve as grounds for affirming another statement called the conclusion. Philosophers typically distinguish arguments in natural languages (such as English) into two fundamentally different types: deductive and inductive. Each type of argument is said to have characteristics that categorically distinguish it from the other type. The two types of argument are also said to be subject to differing evaluative standards. Pointing to paradigmatic examples of each type of argument helps to clarify their key differences. The distinction between the two types of argument may hardly seem worthy of philosophical reflection, as evidenced by the fact that their differences are usually presented as straightforward, such as in many introductory philosophy textbooks. Nonetheless, the question of how best to distinguish deductive from inductive arguments, and indeed whether there is a coherent categorical distinction between them at all, turns out to be considerably more problematic than commonly recognized. This article identifies and discusses a range of different proposals for marking categorical differences between deductive and inductive arguments while highlighting the problems and limitations attending each. Consideration is also given to the ways in which one might do without a distinction between two types of argument by focusing instead solely on the application of evaluative standards to arguments.
Original Publication Citation
Shanahan, T. (2022). Deductive and Inductive Arguments | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. In Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://iep.utm.edu/deductive-inductive-arguments/
Publisher Statement
Digital Commons @ LMU & LLS Citation
Shanahan, Timothy, "Deductive and Inductive Arguments" (2022). Philosophy Faculty Works. 290.
https://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/phil_fac/290
