Document Type
Article - On Campus Only
Publication Date
2012
Abstract
This essay argues that the thief, a liminal figure that haunts the boundary of political membership and the border between the law of reason and the law of beasts, drives Locke’s accounts of the foundation of the commonwealth and the right to rebellion in the Second Treatise of Government. Locke’s political theory is best read through punishment as a theory of subject formation, which relies on an unstable concept of proportionality to produce this liminal figure in order to secure the member as a “stable” political subject.
Original Publication Citation
Dilts, Andrew. “To Kill a Thief: Punishment, Proportionality, and Criminal Subjectivity in Locke’s Second Treatise.” Political Theory, no. 40 (2012): 58–83.
Digital Commons @ LMU & LLS Citation
Dilts, Andrew, "To Kill a Thief: Punishment, Proportionality, and Criminal Subjectivity in Locke’s Second Treatise" (2012). Political Science and International Relations Faculty Works. 186.
https://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/poli_fac/186
