Document Type
Article
Publication Date
2019
Abstract
In this article, we investigate how threat perceptions and emotions can jointly impact individuals’ attitudes toward drone strikes. We argue that conditions of threat can increase public support for the use of drone strikes. We further contend that the effect of threat perceptions on support for drone strikes is mediated by negative, emotional reactions, particularly anger. We test our arguments in France, the United States, and Turkey using data generated from nationally representative online surveys, in which individuals were randomly assigned to a control group, a condition in which they read about terrorist threat (with or without a reminder of democratic values), or a condition in which they read about economic threats. Our findings have implications for long-standing notions about the roles of rational calculations and psychological processes in influencing support for aggressive foreign policy.
Original Publication Citation
Fisk, Kerstin, Jennifer L. Merolla, and Jennifer M. Ramos. “Emotions, Terrorist Threat, and Drones: Anger Drives Support for Drone Strikes.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 63, no. 4 (April 1, 2019): 976–1000. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002718770522.
Digital Commons @ LMU & LLS Citation
Fisk, Kerstin; Merolla, Jennifer L.; and Ramos, Jennifer, "Emotions, Terrorist Threat, and Drones: Anger Drives Support for Drone Strikes" (2019). Political Science and International Relations Faculty Works. 306.
https://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/poli_fac/306
