• Home
  • Search
  • Browse Collections
  • My Account
  • About
  • DC Network Digital Commons Network™
Skip to main content
Digital Commons at Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School
  • Home
  • About
  • FAQ
  • My Account

Home > CIA > CEEL > CEELREPORTS

Reports

 
Printing is not supported at the primary Gallery Thumbnail page. Please first navigate to a specific Image before printing.

Follow

Switch View View Slideshow
 
  • Sobrato Early Academic Language (SEAL) Model: Final Report of Findings from a Four-Year Study by Center for Equity for English Learners, Loyola Marymount University and Wexford Institute

    Sobrato Early Academic Language (SEAL) Model: Final Report of Findings from a Four-Year Study

    Center for Equity for English Learners, Loyola Marymount University and Wexford Institute

    The Sobrato Early Academic Language (SEAL) Model Research and Evaluation Final Report is comprised of three sets of studies that took place between 2015 and 2019 to examine the effectiveness of the SEAL Model in 67 schools within 12 districts across the state of California.

    Over a decade ago, the Sobrato Family Foundation responded to the enduring opportunity gaps and low academic outcomes for the state’s 1.2 million English Learners by investing in the design of the SEAL Model. The SEAL PreK–Grade 3 Model was created as a whole-school initiative to develop students’ language, literacy, and academic skills. The pilot study revealed promising findings, and the large-scale implementation of SEAL was launched in 2013. This report addresses a set of research questions and corresponding studies focused on: 1) the perceptions of school and district-level leaders regarding district and school site implementation of the SEAL Model, 2) teachers’ development and practices, and 3) student outcomes. The report is organized in five sections, within which are twelve research briefs that address the three areas of study. Technical appendices are included in each major section. A developmental evaluation process with mixed methods research design was used to answer the research questions. Key findings indicate that the implementation of the SEAL Model has taken root in many schools and districts where there is evidence of systemic efforts or instructional improvement for the English Learners they serve. In regards to teachers’ development and practices, there were statistically significant increases in the use of research-based practices for English Learners. Teachers indicated a greater sense of efficacy in addressing the needs of this population and believe the model has had a positive impact on their knowledge and skills to support the language and literacy development of PreK- Grade 3 English Learners. Student outcome data reveal that despite SEAL schools averaging higher rates of poverty compared to the statewide rate, SEAL English Learners in grades 2–4 performed comparably or better than California English Learners in developing their English proficiency; additional findings show that an overwhelming majority of SEAL students are rapidly progressing towards proficiency thus preventing them from becoming long-term English Learners. English Learners in bilingual programs advanced in their development of Spanish, while other English Learners suffered from language loss in Spanish. The final section of the report provides considerations and implications for further SEAL replication, sustainability, additional research and policy.

  • The PROMISE Initiative: Pursuing Regional Opportunities for Mentoring, Innovation, and Success for English Learners by Laurie Olsen, Kathryn Lindholm Leary, Magaly Lavadenz, Elvira G. Armas, and Franca Dell'Olio

    The PROMISE Initiative: Pursuing Regional Opportunities for Mentoring, Innovation, and Success for English Learners

    Laurie Olsen, Kathryn Lindholm Leary, Magaly Lavadenz, Elvira G. Armas, and Franca Dell'Olio

    The Foundation: A Vision for English Learner Success in Southern California

    In 2002, the superintendents of five Southern California County Offices of Education, building on a strong relationship of collaboration and support, began to discuss a pattern that was similar across the counties of Los Angeles, Orange, San Bernardino, San Diego, and Riverside – the alarmingly low academic performance of English learners (EL).

    These five counties combined serve over one million EL students, more than 64% of the total EL population in the state of California, and close to 20% of the EL population in the nation. (U.S. Department of Education, 2004). Upon a cross analysis of students in all five counties, startling and highly concerning data showed the decreasing academic performance of students at both the elementary and secondary levels. At second grade only 13 to 22% of ELs in these counties were meeting the proficiency level in Language Arts. The picture worsened every year ELs were in school with only 2-4% of EL in the 11th grade were performing at a rate of proficient or above in Language Arts on the California Standards Test (CST). When scores on the California High School Exit Exam were examined, it showed that only 39% of ELs in the five counties were passing the Language Arts portion of the exam compared to 82% of California’s English-Only students and 49% of ELs passed the math portion in comparison to 78% statewide. Coupled with that, data also showed that fewer than 7% of ELs in these counties had full access to both English Language Development (ELD) and the core academic curriculum.

    Grappling with both the increasing scale of non-success of ELs and how this gap in achievement reflected a disservice to students of diverse linguistic and cultural backgrounds, the superintendents moved to act. They formed a commitment to address these issues, called on key staff in each of their county offices of education to collaborate and address the glaring evidence that a certain sector of Southern California’s student population was being underserved and concentrate on the urgent need for improving student achievement.

    From late 2002 to 2004, educators and researchers across these five counties worked diligently to identify existing strengths and challenges and provide evidence of promising programs and practices that were meeting the needs of students in various pockets of success throughout Southern California. Under the leadership of the Assistant Superintendents of Instruction from the five counties, data was compiled, effective programs were shared, and a common vision for the success of ELs began to emerge – a vision that was centered on collaborating to develop a transformative approach that by design builds bilingualism, biliteracy, and multiculturalism that systemically uses ELs’ languages, cultures, experiences, and skills as foundation for their learning and success.

    From this beginning phase of development, The PROMISE Initiative – Pursuing Regional Opportunities for Mentoring, Innovation, and Success for English Learners – was born. Research development continued, funding was sought and applied for, trips to Washington DC occurred to procure the support of congressional leaders, a director of the project was hired and a formal organizational structure was implemented to draw on the support of the county offices of education to begin to build the vision and theory of action of the proposed pilot study. A sixth county partner, the Ventura County Office of Education, became aware of the work being done in its neighboring counties and asked to join the collaborative. With the addition of Ventura County, the six counties now represent 66% of all ELs in the state.

    The PROMISE Initiative proposed a bold shift in how programs are delivered to ELs. PROMISE espoused a critical vision that ensures that ELs achieve and sustain high levels of proficiency, including literacy, in English and the home language; high levels of academic achievement, including proficiency on state standards across the curriculum and maintenance of that achievement in English after participation in specialized English Learner programs and through grade 12; sophisticated sociocultural and multicultural competency; preparation for successful transition to higher education; successful preparation as a 21st century global citizen; and high levels of motivation, confidence, and self-assurance.

    The PROMISE Initiative operated under five overarching goals:

    • To fully define and operationalize the essential research-based PROMISE core principles for effective EL education.
    • To design, pilot and field test a process for adapting and enacting the principles in local contexts, including district, site and county level systems and infrastructure, that will maximally support the implementation.
    • To develop expertise and resources based on that work that respond to both traditional and high need/underserved EL populations.
    • To develop high-quality products and materials and disseminate to states, districts, and schools to assist them in identifying, developing, implementing, and monitoring implementation of proven programs.
    • To develop the processes for ensuring the appropriate adoption, implementation, and monitoring of EL models, strategies, and programs by other districts and schools.

    The focus of the PROMISE Initiative has been to marshal the expertise and resources of the six counties by developing a powerful infrastructure for carrying out two big pieces of work. First, through PROMISE, research was conducted to distill a core of research-based guiding principles, and identify programs, strategies, and approaches for EL success aligned to these core principles. Second, PROMISE defined and piloted a reform model focused on building the capacity of schools and districts to implement powerful principles-based EL programs that result in English proficiency, mastery of academic content, and development of 21st century competencies.

    The core of this systemic transformation model was a vision- and principles-based reform utilizing systemic co-design and collaboration strategies to put into practice what works to meet the needs of ELs. This reform model promoted the customization and operationalization of the eight PROMISE Core Principles (as listed and described below) through a specific action plan customized for each site to meet the needs of EL students:

    • ENRICHED AND AFFIRMING LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS – Create a safe, affirming, and enriched environment for participatory and inclusive learning.
    • EMPOWERING PEDAGOGY – Use culturally and linguistically responsive pedagogy that maximizes learning, actively accesses and develops student voice, and provides opportunities for leadership.
    • CHALLENGING AND RELEVANT CURRICULUM – Engage ELs in well articulated and age-appropriate curriculum that purposefully builds bilingualism, biliteracy, and multiculturalism. This curriculum is cognitively complex, coherent, relevant, and challenging.
    • HIGH QUALITY INSTRUCTIONAL RESOURCES – Provide and utilize high quality standards-aligned instructional resources that provide equitable access to core curriculum and academic language in the classroom, school, and community.
    • VALID AND COMPREHENSIVE ASSESSMENT – Build and implement valid and comprehensive assessment systems designed to promote reflective practice and data driven planning in order to improve academic, linguistic, and sociocultural outcomes for ELs.
    • HIGH QUALITY PROFESSIONAL PREPARATION & SUPPORT – Provide coherent, comprehensive, and ongoing professional preparation and support programs based on well-defined standards of practice. These programs are designed to create professional learning communities of administrators, teachers, and other staff to implement the PROMISE vision of excellent teaching for ELs.
    • POWERFUL FAMILY/COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT – Implement strong family and community engagement programs that build leadership capacity and value and draw upon community funds of knowledge to inform, support, and enhance teaching and learning for ELs.
    • ADVOCACY-ORIENTED ADMINISTRATIVE/LEADERSHIP SYSTEMS – Provide advocacy-oriented administration and leadership that institute system-wide mechanisms to focus all stakeholders on the diverse needs and assets of ELs. These administrative and leadership systems structure, organize, coordinate, and integrate programs and services to respond systemically to EL needs.

 
 
 

Search

Advanced Search

  • Notify me via email or RSS

Browse

  • Collections
  • Disciplines
  • Authors

Submissions

  • Author FAQ

Galleries

  • Expert Gallery
  • SelectedWorks

Resources

  • Scholarly Communications Libguide

About

  • About Digital Commons
  • FAQ
  • Contact Us
  • Sign Up for Email Notifications
 
Digital Commons

Home | About | FAQ | My Account | Accessibility Statement

Privacy Copyright