Volume 25, Number 3 (1992) Symposium: Does Evidence Law Matter?
Symposium
Foreword: Does Eveidence Law Matter
David P. Leonard and Victor J. Gold
Who Needs Evidence Rules, Anyway
Stephan Landsman
Does It Matter Who is in Charge of Evidence Law
Eleanor Swift
Making the Law of Factual Determinations Matter More
Randolph N. Jonakait
Rape, Lies, and Videotape
Robert Garcia
What's the Matter with Evidence
Kenneth W. Graham Jr.
Rules of Evidence and Substantive Policy
David P. Leonard
Meta-Evidence: Do We Need It
Christopher B. Mueller
Scholarly and Institutional Challenges to the Law of Evidence: From Bentham to the ADR Movement
Laird C. Kirkpatrick
The Law of Evidence and the Idea of Progress
Michael S. Ariens
The Myth of Conditional Relevancy
Ronald J. Allen
Evidentiary Rules and Rulings: The Role of Treatises
Richard D. Friedman
When, If Ever, Does Evidentiary Error Constitute Reversible Error
Margaret A. Berger
Do the Federal Rules of Evidence Matter
Victor J. Gold
The Effect of the Catchalls on Criminal Defendants: Little Red Riding Hood Meets the Hearsay Wolf and is Devoured
Myrna S. Raeder
Suspect Evidence: Admissibility of Co-Conspirator Statements and Uncorroborated Accomplice Testimony
J. Arthur L. Alarcon
The Pretrial Importance and Adaptation of the Trial Evidence Rules
Edward J. Imwrinkelried
Does Evidence Law Matter in Criminal Suppression Hearings
Elizabeth Phillips Marsh
Evolution in Child Abuse Litigation: The Theoretical Void where Evidentiary and Procedural Worlds Collide
William Wesley Patton
Notes and Comments
